Wednesday, May 8, 2019

190505 Sermon on John 10:11-16 (Easter 3) May 5, 2019


190505 Sermon on John 10:11-16 (Easter 3) May 5, 2019


One of the principles that Americans have held most dear is the freedom of religion.  The government does not force anyone to go to any particular church.  The government isn’t even supposed to advise the citizens which church to go to.  This is a personal matter for us Americans.  Some go one place.  Others go someplace else.  This has also enabled the churches to manage their own affairs according to their own lights.  That is the greatest blessing that has come with the formation of our American government.  Our church would not be the way that it is—we would not be able to believe, teach, and confess the Bible the way that we do—if what we do was dictated by the will of the majority. 
The state churches of Europe, where the government is involved in the teachings and practices of the Christian churches, have totally apostatized.  They won’t believe anything that has not been cleared by the skeptics who have the power in the universities.  The governmental control caused the educational institutions and the positions of authority in the churches to be filled by skeptics.  But in our country we have had the ability to choose the professors and leaders whom we want.  This has allowed us to choose believers to occupy these positions, and even some very outspoken, aggressive believers—especially in times past.  Whatever strength and health that still remain in our church was made possible by this freedom.
But the freedom of religion has also had its negative effects as well.  The worst of these is the powerful impression that is given to people that religion is unimportant.  When things are not required by those who are in authority over us we can’t help but unwittingly think that these things are more or less unimportant.  The government cares about schooling and laws and paying taxes.  Accordingly you find that the average citizen considers this stuff important.  They don’t play around with it.  But the government says nothing about religion.  Everybody can do what they want. 
This gives the impression that religion is like other things that the government doesn’t care about.  The government doesn’t care where you go on vacation.  It doesn’t care what food you eat.  It doesn’t care what car you drive.  We all know that it would be silly to argue with people about their vacations, food, and forms of transportation.  This is the way that people also look at religion.  It is as though religion is a dessert.  You can take it or leave it.  Our own people in our congregations are not immune to this either.  In our families jobs and schools and sports and a whole bunch of other things are much more important than what is taught in church.
The freedom of religion means that we are on our own when it comes to impressing upon our people the importance of what we believe.  If fathers, especially (to whom the duty is given), but also mothers, grandparents, aunts and uncles, and other authorities God puts into the lives of our people do not show reverence for the Gospel, then it is only natural and inevitable that it will fade away.  That is the tradeoff with the freedom of religion.  We are free to believe, teach, and confess as we please, but we also are responsible for how we conduct ourselves.  The government won’t do it for us.  If we don’t do it, then it will die out.
Another negative effect of the freedom of religion is similar.  Our people are given the strong impression that what is taught in churches doesn’t really matter.  One church says this, another says that.  You say tomato, I say tomato.  Who cares?  There are bigger fish to fry.  Subtly and unintentionally our people are taken in by the idea that the Word of God doesn’t actually have anything to say about how we live our life.  Each can believe and do as he or she pleases, because that’s what the government says.
But this is one place where God’s Word very explicitly and emphatically disagrees with our founding fathers if they are understood in such a way where it doesn’t matter what a person believes or does.  The second commandment strictly forbids people from claiming to be speaking God’s word and operating under the cover of God’s name, but then to speak lies instead of the truth.  There is no greater sin that can be committed outwardly than when people claim to be speaking the truth about God and his Word, but they are not.  Instead they are twisting the Scriptures or even vomiting up the stuff that comes from their own brains. 
It matters whether God is triune—one God in three persons.  There are a lot of folks who claim to be Christians, but they do not teach this.  And so even though they swear up and down that they are Christians they are actually worshipping some other god or gods even while using the Christian vocabulary that sounds so familiar.
Or there are some Christians who say that baptism doesn’t save.  Well, does it or doesn’t it?  Or the Lord’s Supper is mere bread and wine.  If that is the case, then surely we can’t trust bread and wine for the forgiveness of sins.  Or is the pope the vicar of Christ on earth, and are we duty bound to be served by priests who have received a special anointment from him that enables them to sacrifice the mass?  Are we saved by Jesus's atonement on the cross alone or is there something that we need to add to it?  Or do we need to prepare ourselves to receive his grace or was our baptism as a child not good enough and we need to be baptized again as an adult?
If a poll were conducted on these matters the overwhelming answer would undoubtedly be, “Who cares!?”  A lot of smart people would want us to believe that this apathy is a great advance—that we aren’t fighting about these kinds of things anymore.  They want to portray it as a great advancement that we have made in our learning.  But that is not what it is at all.  It is just plain laziness and boredom.  People don’t want to go to the trouble to find out what is true.  People are apathetic because they believe that this stuff doesn’t matter.  They have no fear of God or of the devil.  This uncaring attitude is not an advancement.  It is a degeneration.  But this way of looking at things is incredibly widespread. 
When we take up our Gospel reading, therefore, most can understand very little of the truth contained therein.  What they take in is a pleasant idea, a pleasant picture.  Jesus is the good Shepherd.  He is a good option for people, therefore, if they should ever need him.  But all the seriousness and danger has been emptied out of the picture.  Sheep are helpless against wolves.  They have no fangs or claws and they aren’t hardly fast enough to get away.  Jesus is the good Shepherd because he fights the wolf and lays down his life for the sheep.  Either the good Shepherd protects the sheep or the sheep are dead.  There is no middle ground. 
That makes Jesus more important than even those medicines or technologies or other advancements that could save our earthly lives.  He saves us from the devil and hell.  We are even more impotent in fighting against these fierce foes as we are against death.  Nobody can win the war against death, and so what chance is there that we sheep can defeat these other enemies that go along with it.  Jesus, the good Shepherd, is therefore not just an option or a dessert, whom you can take or leave and it makes little difference either way.  Heaven and hell is on the line.
The way that we interact with the good Shepherd is also very important.  Jesus says that his sheep know him and they follow his voice.  Jesus’s voice is the Word of God.  But the true Word of God has to compete with all kinds of other voices.  Some of these voices are outside of the Church and would have you believe false things about life and its meaning.  Some of these voices are within the Church and would have you disbelieve the things that you should believe in, and believe in things that you shouldn’t believe. 
For example, there are voices that say that baptism is only a sign of your obedience or that being baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit is not valid, but that you must be baptized in Jesus’s name.  These people disturb believers’ faith in the very place that it should be—in God’s saving actions towards us in baptism according to his very own Word and institution.  If that isn’t a case of thwarting Jesus’s voice, then I don’t know what is.  Jesus says one thing, but they say another.  And it is not as though he is unclear.  He tells the apostles to baptize all nations in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.  He says “Whoever believes and is baptized shall be saved, whoever does not believe will be condemned.”  But these enemies of Christ turn people away from what Jesus has told us to believe in to other things that will fail.  Your baptism in the name of the Father and the of the Son and of the Holy Spirit will not fail you, so long as you continue to believe it.  You have Jesus’s own promise in that regard.  I’d much rather trust Jesus than some so-called expert.
The devil’s specialty is to engage in these kinds of spiritual lies.  Our flesh has its lusts.  The world offers us empty philosophy.  The devil is right in the heart of the Church and engages in deceptions whenever and wherever he can.  This is why the Christian Church is so fragmented.  The truth unites, but these lies drive apart.  And he is an incredibly good liar.  A very large amount of my preaching and teaching with you is for the purpose of exposing these lies so that you may hold to the truth.  He is even such a good liar that there isn’t a single Christian who perfectly withstands them all. 
And so it is necessary for us to clean out our ears so that we can hear the voice of the good Shepherd.  We would go a long way towards that goal of listening to Jesus if we shake off the common notions held all around us that religion or Church isn’t really a big deal—that there are much more important matters to which we should attend—stuff that makes money, for example.  And also that it doesn’t matter what the churches teach—that they are all pretty much the same.  Maybe they seem the same to those who deliberately don’t pay attention, but they are by no means the same.  And to realize that they are not the same and that these differences matter is part of being instructed by the voice of Jesus.  How can you tell the difference between Jesus’s voice and liars’ voices if you never learn from God’s Word what that voice actually is?
In order for the voice of Jesus to continue to be heard among us we have to recognize that there are higher requirements that are placed upon us than there are for other citizens.  It’s normal and natural to just go with the flow and to allow the authorities to tell you what is important and not, what you should and shouldn’t do.  But in this country we have freedom of religion, which is a very great blessing.  Our authorities aren’t going to tell anybody anything about going to Church.  And with the increasing dechristianization that is overtaking one family after another, other places of authority in our families are no longer impressing the importance of hearing Jesus’s voice.  Therefore, we must be deliberate and intentional in our speaking and teaching and examples.  Nobody is going to do it for us.  If we don’t do it, then it won’t get done.  It is a very good thing that the government keeps its nose out of our business as a church, but then we also have to recognize our responsibility.
Engaging in this work is not for the purpose of maintaining a culture or heritage—kind of like a museum—as though being German or Scandinavian or even Lutheran is what is important.  What’s at stake is the voice of the good Shepherd.  That voice is heard through Christians—fathers, mothers, friends, fellow members of the congregation, pastors and professors.  That voice is the way that we are able to follow Jesus.  Without that voice we are lost and defenseless.  And so we must change the way that we think and have this change also carry over into our lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment